Russia Launches Second Stealth Warship For India

Russia launched the second of three stealth frigates for the Indian Navy under USD 1.6 billion deal inked in July 2006.

The launching ceremony of the missile frigate Tarkash (Quiver) in Russia’s Baltic exclave of Kaliningrad, was attended by senior Russian and Indian naval officials, state-owned Yantar shipyard said in a release.

The first of three Project 11356 (modified Krivak III) frigates, named the Teg (Sword), was launched in last November.

The third frigate, Trikand (Bow) is due to be delivered in 2011-12.

The new frigates, also known as Talwar class, will be armed with eight BrahMos supersonic cruise missiles.

They will be also equipped with a 100-mm gun, a Shtil surface-to-air missile system, two Kashtan air-defence gun/missile systems, two twin 533-mm torpedo launchers, and an antisubmarine warfare (ASW) helicopter.

Earlier, Russia’s Baltiisky Zavod shipyard had built three stealth frigates of the same class – INS Talwar, INS Trishul and INS Tabar.

Continuing the tradition of the Indian Navy to name naval ships of the same class with same letter in the beginning, President Pratibha Patil during her Russia visit last September had christened the new frigates as the Teg, the Tarkash and the Trikand at various stages of completion at Yantar Shipyard. Zeenews

Iran Rejects Nuclear Swap Deadline Set By US

iran rejects nuclear swap deadline_Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast on Wednesday rejected a nuclear swap deadline set by the United States, the state-run IRNA news agency reported.

On Tuesday, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said that December is “a very real deadline” for Iran to “pursue its responsibilities” on the nuclear issue.

Responding to Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s defiance over the year-end deadline, Gibbs said while Ahmadinejad “may not recognize … the deadline that looms, but that is a very real deadline for the international community.”

Mehmanparast said that Iran rejects the December deadline for Iran to accept a deal for swapping enriched uranium with nuclear fuel, adding that the new deadline is not something new.

Tehran is still waiting for response from six major countries to its nuclear fuel swap proposal, Mehmanparast said.

Iran has proposed to swap nuclear fuel at the Iranian Kish Island to secure fuel supply for a Tehran medical research reactor and the six major countries might have a new proposal to offer, he said.

“Iran welcomes any proposal to meet the demand for fuel to the Tehran reactor,” he was quoted as saying.

“Iran has adopted a crystal clear stand on its peaceful nuclear activities and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is responsible to provide Iran with nuclear fuel based on its Charter and the Non-Proliferation Treaty,” Mehmanparast said.

“If they refuse to meet our legal demand, it will be quite natural for Iran to produce 20 percent nuclear fuel for the reactor,” he said.

Under a draft deal brokered by the UN nuclear watchdog, most of Iran’s existing low-grade enriched uranium would be shipped to Russia and France by the end of the year, where it would be processed into fuel rods with the purity of 20 percent.

The higher-level enriched uranium would be transported back to Iran to be used in the research reactor in Tehran for the manufacture of medical radioisotopes.

Iran has rejected the deal, demanding a simultaneous exchange between low and higher level enriched uranium inside the country.

The United States and its Western allies have been accusing Iran of secretly developing nuclear weapons under the disguise of civilian nuclear power. Iran has denied the accusation and stressed its nuclear program is only for peaceful purposes.

The United States has threatened another round of UN sanctions against Iran if it does not abide by the year-end deadline. China Daily

NATO Allies Pledge 7,000 Troops

nato allies pledge 7,000 troops_NATO allies will bolster the US troop surge in Afghanistan by sending at least 7,000 soldiers of their own, officials said in pledges that US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton described as crucial to turning the tide in the stalemated war.

The promised increase on Friday came as US Marines and Afghan troops launched the first offensive since US President Barack Obama announced a 30,000-troop US increase. The Marines and Afghan forces struck Taliban communications and supply lines on Friday in an insurgent stronghold in southern Afghanistan.

In yet another war development, US officials said the Obama administration may expand missile strikes on al-Qaeda and the Taliban inside Pakistan and will focus on training Pakistan’s forces in a border area where militants have been aiding the Afghan insurgency.

The Marine Corps offensive was part of preparations for the arrival of the 30,000 US reinforcements, General David Petraeus said. The top general in charge of both the Afghanistan and Iraq wars said the military has been working for months to extend what he called “the envelope of security” around key towns in Helmand and Kandahar provinces.

Hundreds of Marines were dropped by helicopter and MV-22 Osprey aircraft behind Taliban lines in the northern end of the Now Zad Valley of Helmand Province, scene of heavy fighting last summer, Marine spokesman Major William Pelletier said.

In Brussels, Clinton told allied foreign ministers that it was essential that contributions to the war effort be provided as quickly as possible. She thanked Italy for its announcement that it will send an additional 1,000 troops and Britain for its pledge of another 500, but she said nonmilitary assistance is equally important.

“The need for additional forces is urgent, but their presence will not be indefinite,” she told the North Atlantic Council, NATO’s highest political group.

NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen of Denmark told reporters at the organization’s headquarters that still further NATO forces might be in the offing, suggesting there would be “more to come.”

Also, Admiral James Stavridis, the top NATO and US commander in Europe, said in an interview that he expects several thousand more non-US troops might be added to the 7,000.

“What we are all underlining to potential troop contributors is that we are truly asking for emphasis in the training area,” Stavridis said.

The transformation of Afghanistan’s army and police is critical to fulfill Obama’s intention to begin pulling out US units 18 months from now.

According to a copy of Clinton’s prepared remarks to the closed-door NATO meeting, she told the ministers that “the pace, size and scope of the drawdown will be predicated on the situation on the ground.”

“If things are going well, a larger number of forces could be removed from more areas,” she said. “If not, the size and speed of the drawdown will be adjusted accordingly.”

Fogh Rasmussen said: “Transition [to Afghan control] does not mean exit.”

Afghanistan’s security forces have been hobbled by a lack of training and resources, but US officials hope to bolster their ability by sending them out with US and allied troops into battle zones.

At least 150 Afghan troops joined about 1,000 Marines in Friday’s offensive in Helmand, said Daood Ahmadi, a spokesman for the province’s governor. He said the bodies of four slain Taliban had been recovered and more than 300 mines and roadside bombs turned up by Friday evening.

The new offensive aims to cut off the Taliban communication routes through Helmand and disrupt their supply lines, especially those providing explosives for the roadside bombs.”  Taipei Times

Obama’s Blunt Ultimatum To Pak To Stop Use Of Lashkar-e-Taiba To ‘Pursue Policy Goals’

obama's blunt ultimatum_Frustrated over Islamabad’s indifference towards terror organizations such as Al Qaeda and Lashkar-e-Taiba, President Barack Obama has warned that the United States may be impelled to use any means at its disposal to rout insurgents based along Pak-Afghan border, if Pakistan cannot deliver. In his letter to Pakistan President Asif Ali Zardari, Obama called for Islamabad’s closer collaboration against all extremist groups, including al-Qaeda, the Afghan Taliban, the Haqqani network, Lashkar-e-Taiba, and the Pakistani Taliban organization known as Tehrik-e-Taliban, and warned that its use of insurgent groups to pursue policy goals “cannot continue.”

Obama’s letter to Zardari, delivered through national security adviser Gen. James L. Jones, also included an offer to help reduce tensions between Pakistan and India.

During his Islamabad visit, Jones told Pakistani officials that no matter how many more troops the Obama sends to Afghanistan, the effort would fail unless Pakistan increases strikes against not only Al Qaeda’s leadership but also Mullah Muhammad Omar and the leadership of the Afghan Taliban.

Meanwhile, senior US officials cautioned that moves to put too many demands before Islamabad may backfire.

“We agree that no matter how many troops you send, if the safe haven in Pakistan isn’t cracked, the whole mission is compromised. But if you make too many demands on the Pakistanis in public, it can backfire,” The New York Times quoted the official, as saying.

Pointing out the complexity of the US-Pakistan relationship, another Obama administration official said that no success could be hoped against the Taliban unless the nature of the relationship with Islamabad is changed.

“Everyone understands this is a complex, nuanced, critical relationship. Everyone has their eyes open, and there are genuine concerns. But one focus now is on trying to expand cooperation,” he said.

“The long-term consequences of failure there (in Pakistan) far outweigh those in Afghanistan. We can’t succeed without Pakistan,” he added. Newstrack India

Guv’s Climate Panel Is Mostly Cloudy

guv's climate panel_Gov. Gary Herbert says the scientific jury is still out on climate change and he has promised an honest-to-goodness debate on one of the major policies of our time.

While the new administration is beginning to move on the pledge first made in August, the shape and nature of the forum has yet to crystallize.

Scientists at the state’s leading universities — Utah, Brigham Young and Utah State — have offered to help the governor untangle the technicalities of climate change. So have members of the Blue-Ribbon Advisory Committee on climate change, a multifaceted group that studied the issue for a year and advised former Gov. Jon Huntsman Jr. on the subject.

But no one has yet received invitations for Herbert’s forum because the organizers haven’t decided who should participate.

“It’s very much in the formative stage,” said Kirk Jowers, director of the University of Utah’s Hinckley Institute of Politics and one of the organizers of the event.

And, while it is unclear who will play a big role in the meeting — tentatively slated for April, around Earth Day — what will be up for discussion is certain.

“Science will be the place to start,” said Jowers. “All sides will be presented fairly. That is absolutely the single most important thing.”

Ted Wilson, Herbert’s new environment czar, echoes the idea that balance is essential. As the forum’s lead organizer, he has been fielding ideas about recommended speakers from

science, economics and other disciplines. The panels will include “rainmaker-type featured speakers,” who will not debate, and scientists, who will.

It’s unclear whether the governor’s forum will be a replay of the Legislature’s Public Utilities Committee climate change hearing last month.

The panel invited scientific experts for their input. But it created what some criticized as a false balance by giving equal weight to University of Utah Atmospheric Science Department Chairman Jim Steenburgh, who represented the consensus view of climate scientists, and Roy Spencer. Spencer is an atmospheric scientist from the University of Alabama who has been one of the most vocal skeptics of the prevailing view that humans are largely responsible for global warming.

Wilson said Herbert is interested in getting to the truth in order to form responsible policies.

“This is a governor who wants his departments to do all they can to prepare for the future,” said Wilson, a former Salt Lake City mayor and past director of the Hinckley Institute.

The discussion is expected to be still another step in the evolution of the Republican governor’s handling of a climate change policy to help Utah deal with what scientists expect to be hotter temperatures statewide and deeper droughts in southern parts of the state.

Last summer, Herbert told the Western Governors Association he is not convinced climate science is conclusive and questioned the state’s continued involvement in the Western Climate Initiative, a regional organization focused on responding to global warming.

In a September report released with U.S. Sen. Orrin Hatch, Herbert said Utah’s economy and people would be devastated by cap-and-trade legislation aimed at coping with climate change. In October, he restated his view that “the debate is raging” about the human impact on climate change.

“Maybe the scientists, maybe they feel good,” he told reporters during a televised news conference. “But they are not getting the word to the public because the public is very confused on the issue.”

Jon A. Krosnick has been studying the disconnect between climate science and personal actions for more than a decade as a professor of communication and political science at Stanford University.

Citing opinion surveys, he said the public overwhelmingly believes that the Earth’s climate is changing, the impact to society will be bad and that government should take action. But they are “not buying” that a disaster is on the horizon, as some scientists suggest.

One reason: The mass-media practice of representing the science as two-sided creates confusion. Another: Scientists do a lousy job of offering plausible solutions for dealing with climate change.

He said a forum based on simply presenting opposing views without providing context is unlikely to clear up the confusion.

“It will increase uncertainty,” Krosnick said, unless organizers also “tell people the prevalence of those views and the preponderance of evidence supporting them.”

More than 70 of the world’s scientific associations have published statements affirming that climate is changing most likely because of human activities and that it is a growing threat to human societies.

Kelly Patterson, a BYU political scientist, said he doubts a single forum like Herbert’s will do much to affect public opinion. On complex issues like climate change, people form their views based on what they see, hear and read in the media, as well as what they learn from associates, he said.

“Rare is the individual who sits down and weighs the evidence,” he said. “In these kinds of situations, people tend to side with trusted sources.” By Judy Fahys, The Salt Lake Tribune

‘Majestic’ Forbidden City Wows Obama

obama at forbidden city_Anyone who has visited Beijing’s Forbidden City, the historic former home of China’s emperors during the Ming (1368-1644) and Qing (1644-1911) dynasties, knows even an entire day inside the massive architectural masterpiece is barely enough time to scratch the surface.

And for a president on a tight schedule, a whistle-stop tour of the landmark was always likely to be more of a photo opportunity than a learning experience.

But for United States President Barack Obama, a visit to the world-famous complex was not to be missed, no matter how limited his time.

Obama took a break from his diplomatic mission to Asia yesterday to spend 50 minutes inside the Forbidden City, which is also known as the Palace Museum.

Today, he will carve a little more me-time from his busy four-day agenda in China to visit the Great Wall before he leaves the country for the next leg of his tour in the Republic of Korea.

“It’s beautiful. It’s a magnificent place to visit. I will come back with my girls and my wife,” Obama said before leaving the museum through the northern Gate of Divine Prowess (Shenwu Men).

Fifty minutes earlier, Obama and Forbidden City curator Zheng Xinmiao had entered the palace through the main entrance on the south side – the Meridian Gate (Wu Men). The president had walked along the museum’s central axis, which is also the north-south line along which Beijing is orientated.

The Forbidden City was closed to the public for Obama’s visit.

In the bright sunshine and cool wind, without the usual hoards of visitors, the palace was a peaceful place. Its golden glazed rooftops still bore a dusting of snow that had fallen several days earlier.

Obama, who was dressed in a brown leather jacket and matching leather shoes spoke warmly about the palace.

“Very good!” he exclaimed in front of the Hall of Supreme Harmony (Taihe Dian) while standing before dozens of journalists and photographers. He also posed for photographs in the square in front of the hall.

Inside Taihe Dian, Zheng told Obama about the building’s history and its architecture and Obama asked about the words hanging on a board in the middle of the hall.

“Jian Ji Sui You,” he was told. It meant “emperors should make good rules”.

Taihe Dian was one of the largest wooden structures ever built in China and is the biggest hall in the Forbidden City.

At the Palace of Earthly Tranquility (Kunning Gong), Obama peered through the glass into the rooms that were used on the emperors’ wedding night.

“It is truly majestic, and a testimony to the greatness and longevity of Chinese civilization,” Obama wrote in the official guest book before leaving the museum.

Obama was the fourth incumbent US president to visit the Forbidden City, following in the footsteps of Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford and Bill Clinton.

Asked by reporters what he thought of the Forbidden City, Obama flashed his trademark smile. “Beautiful,” he said. After a slight pause he added, “spectacular”. By Lin Shujuan , China Daily

US Officer Goes On Killing Spree At Army Base

us officer goes on killing spree at army base_Accustomed to terrible human loss overseas, the United States Army was last night struggling to come to terms with a savage outbreak of violence at home after an officer opened fire on the sprawling Fort Hood military base in Texas, which is at the tip of the spear of regular US troop deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan.

After hours of confusion when the entire complex – the largest such base in the world – located between Waco and Austin, was on a security lockdown, a military spokesman confirmed that the rampage had ended with the deaths of 12 people and the wounding of 31 others. Most of the injured had been rushed to hospitals across central Texas. The shock that was rippling across the country last night was hardly relieved after the shooter was identified as a trusted officer with medical duties. Officials said that Major Nadal Malik Hasan, a licensed doctor and psychiatrist, was shot and wounded by military police at the scene but not before he had extinguished the lives of 12 people. Military sources added that two other soldiers were apprehended after the slaughter, though by dusk last night one had been released. There was no information on what role the second may have had in the killings if any. Hasan opened fire, they said, with two handguns. There was no reason he should have been bearing arms as a doctor.

Major Hasan, said to be 39 years old, allegedly opened fire at roughly 1.30 pm, Texas time, inside a personnel processing building formally known as the Soldier Rating and Processing Center. It is a building soldiers routinely pass through while getting ready to deploy. However, at least one of the victims, was identified as a civilian.

A motive for the shooting was hard to pin down last night. However, there were reports that Hasan, who was trained also in psychiatry and medicine in Bethesda, Maryland, was preparing for deployment to Iraq and was not happy to be going there. He had previously worked at the Walter Reed veterans hospital outside Washington.

There have been six incidents on the ground in Iraq since the start of the conflict when US troops have been felled by one of their own with the loss of 14 lives. Last May, a soldier opened fire on fellow soldiers in a medical facility at Camp Liberty outside Baghdad killing five.

Lt General Bob Cone spoke to reporters on the perimeter of the base. “We have had a terrible tragedy at Fort Hood today. The situation is ongoing but we are very close to a resolution,” he said, almost three hours after the first shots were fired.

“The numbers that we are looking at are 12 dead and 31 wounded.” The wounded were being treated in hospitals across central Texas, he said.

The shooting will rekindle debate about the strains that have been placed for years on the US military community after eight years of conflict in Afghanistan and almost as many years in Iraq. For months, military leaders have been seeking ways to monitor the mental health of soldiers precisely to guard against such deadly tragedies. Fort Hood is home to a programme set up to help returning soldiers cope with stress incurred by warfare.

In Washington aides kept President Barack Obama abreast of developments at the huge complex that includes housing areas and several schools. Mr Obama called the shootings “horrifying”. Attending a conference on Native American rights, he added: “My immediate thoughts and prayers are with the wounded and with the families of those who have fallen… we will make sure we get answers to every single question about this horrible incident”.

For soldiers who are trained to face possible injury or worse while deployed abroad, there was no emotional preparation for the shock of such an indiscriminate act of mass killing taking place on US soil and indeed within the confines of one of their own bases where they would have considered themselves entirely safe.

“I am horrified just like everyone else,” Kay Bailey Hutchinson, a US Senator for Texas, said of the killings. “This is a base that has sent people time and time again to Iraq and now to Afghanistan. They have borne a lot of the responsibility for the war on terror and for this to happen at this particular base is heartbreaking.”

As many as 500 military personnel were mobilised at one stage to conduct a sweep of the base to ensure its security. Witnesses on the edge of the facility meanwhile saw ambulances coming and going from the main entrance and helicopters landing inside it to ferry the severely wounded to nearby hospitals.

Members of families were also assembled on parking lots on the edge of the base trying to determine whether any of their loved ones may have been hurt or killed in the shootings.

Fort Hood has close to 50,000 soldiers assigned to it. In addition, it is home to many military families. As well as sending solders into harm’s way in war zones – no other military base in the US has lost more men and women in Iraq than Fort Hood – it has seen many wounded soldiers returning from war.

Fort Hood: The world’s largest military base

* Fort Hood, near Austin, Texas, is the world’s largest military installation, occupying 340 square kilometres.

* It is home to more than 65,000 soldiers, civilian personnel and family members.

* Two armoured divisions are based there, and up to 40,000 US troops.

* It was opened in 1942, as a place to test anti-tank guns that were crucial to combating German blitzkrieg tactics.

* 75 troops at the base have committed suicide between the invasion of Iraq in 2003 and July this year – more than at any other army post.

* The base is home to III Corps, the official counteroffensive force, who are known as “America’s Hammer.”

* In January 2003, then President George W Bush addressed 4,500 troops at the base, and told them to be ready for war.

* The base’s Fourth Infantry Division captured Saddam Hussein in 2003.

By David Usborne, The Independent