NATO allies will bolster the US troop surge in Afghanistan by sending at least 7,000 soldiers of their own, officials said in pledges that US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton described as crucial to turning the tide in the stalemated war.

The promised increase on Friday came as US Marines and Afghan troops launched the first offensive since US President Barack Obama announced a 30,000-troop US increase. The Marines and Afghan forces struck Taliban communications and supply lines on Friday in an insurgent stronghold in southern Afghanistan.

In yet another war development, US officials said the Obama administration may expand missile strikes on al-Qaeda and the Taliban inside Pakistan and will focus on training Pakistan’s forces in a border area where militants have been aiding the Afghan insurgency.

The Marine Corps offensive was part of preparations for the arrival of the 30,000 US reinforcements, General David Petraeus said. The top general in charge of both the Afghanistan and Iraq wars said the military has been working for months to extend what he called “the envelope of security” around key towns in Helmand and Kandahar provinces.

Hundreds of Marines were dropped by helicopter and MV-22 Osprey aircraft behind Taliban lines in the northern end of the Now Zad Valley of Helmand Province, scene of heavy fighting last summer, Marine spokesman Major William Pelletier said.

In Brussels, Clinton told allied foreign ministers that it was essential that contributions to the war effort be provided as quickly as possible. She thanked Italy for its announcement that it will send an additional 1,000 troops and Britain for its pledge of another 500, but she said nonmilitary assistance is equally important.

“The need for additional forces is urgent, but their presence will not be indefinite,” she told the North Atlantic Council, NATO’s highest political group.

NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen of Denmark told reporters at the organization’s headquarters that still further NATO forces might be in the offing, suggesting there would be “more to come.”

Also, Admiral James Stavridis, the top NATO and US commander in Europe, said in an interview that he expects several thousand more non-US troops might be added to the 7,000.

“What we are all underlining to potential troop contributors is that we are truly asking for emphasis in the training area,” Stavridis said.

The transformation of Afghanistan’s army and police is critical to fulfill Obama’s intention to begin pulling out US units 18 months from now.

According to a copy of Clinton’s prepared remarks to the closed-door NATO meeting, she told the ministers that “the pace, size and scope of the drawdown will be predicated on the situation on the ground.”

“If things are going well, a larger number of forces could be removed from more areas,” she said. “If not, the size and speed of the drawdown will be adjusted accordingly.”

Fogh Rasmussen said: “Transition [to Afghan control] does not mean exit.”

Afghanistan’s security forces have been hobbled by a lack of training and resources, but US officials hope to bolster their ability by sending them out with US and allied troops into battle zones.

At least 150 Afghan troops joined about 1,000 Marines in Friday’s offensive in Helmand, said Daood Ahmadi, a spokesman for the province’s governor. He said the bodies of four slain Taliban had been recovered and more than 300 mines and roadside bombs turned up by Friday evening.

The new offensive aims to cut off the Taliban communication routes through Helmand and disrupt their supply lines, especially those providing explosives for the roadside bombs.”  Taipei Times

Frustrated over Islamabad’s indifference towards terror organizations such as Al Qaeda and Lashkar-e-Taiba, President Barack Obama has warned that the United States may be impelled to use any means at its disposal to rout insurgents based along Pak-Afghan border, if Pakistan cannot deliver. In his letter to Pakistan President Asif Ali Zardari, Obama called for Islamabad’s closer collaboration against all extremist groups, including al-Qaeda, the Afghan Taliban, the Haqqani network, Lashkar-e-Taiba, and the Pakistani Taliban organization known as Tehrik-e-Taliban, and warned that its use of insurgent groups to pursue policy goals “cannot continue.”

Obama’s letter to Zardari, delivered through national security adviser Gen. James L. Jones, also included an offer to help reduce tensions between Pakistan and India.

During his Islamabad visit, Jones told Pakistani officials that no matter how many more troops the Obama sends to Afghanistan, the effort would fail unless Pakistan increases strikes against not only Al Qaeda’s leadership but also Mullah Muhammad Omar and the leadership of the Afghan Taliban.

Meanwhile, senior US officials cautioned that moves to put too many demands before Islamabad may backfire.

“We agree that no matter how many troops you send, if the safe haven in Pakistan isn’t cracked, the whole mission is compromised. But if you make too many demands on the Pakistanis in public, it can backfire,” The New York Times quoted the official, as saying.

Pointing out the complexity of the US-Pakistan relationship, another Obama administration official said that no success could be hoped against the Taliban unless the nature of the relationship with Islamabad is changed.

“Everyone understands this is a complex, nuanced, critical relationship. Everyone has their eyes open, and there are genuine concerns. But one focus now is on trying to expand cooperation,” he said.

“The long-term consequences of failure there (in Pakistan) far outweigh those in Afghanistan. We can’t succeed without Pakistan,” he added. Newstrack India